Skip to main content
Independent reviews · Clear choices · No jargon
·7 min read

AI Pricing Guide 2026: Seats, Credits and Tokens

Three meters set every AI price: a seat, a credit and a token. What each one buys, and where a cheaper plan costs more.

Short answer

AI prices look random until you separate three meters: a seat (per person, per month), a credit (consumed at different rates by different features) and a token (only what you use). Flagship assistants sit within a dollar of $20/mo — ChatGPT Plus $20/mo, Claude Pro $20/mo and about $17/mo billed annually — while Gemini spreads across a ladder from Google AI Plus at $4.99/mo to AI Pro at $19.99/mo. DeepSeek is the cost outlier: the chat model is free and its V4.1-Flash API meters at $0.15 per 1M input tokens off-peak, doubling at peak. Images start at Midjourney Basic $10/mo or stay free with open-source Stable Diffusion; coding runs from GitHub Copilot Pro $10/mo to Cursor Pro $20/mo. A $0 stack is real — DeepSeek, Stable Diffusion and the Copilot free tier — and the quiet savings are in annual billing, where ChatGPT Business falls from $25/user/mo to $20/user/mo.

AI pricing looks arbitrary because three different meters are being compared in one list. A chatbot subscription is priced per seat, per month. An image or video tool is often priced in credits, which different features consume at different rates. An API is priced per token, and bills only what you use. Separate the three and much of the apparent chaos resolves — and the decision gets simpler than the price list suggests.

What each meter charges for

The meters are not interchangeable, which is why a $10 tool can cost more than a $20 one. A seat is the most predictable: Cursor Pro at $20/mo costs the same whether you use it ten times or a thousand. A credit plan transfers that risk to you, because the same money buys a different amount of output depending on what you generate — one video with an avatar costs more credits than one without. A metered API has neither a ceiling nor a floor: cheap when you are idle and expensive when a script loops. And one lever is purely arithmetic rather than behavioural, which is annual billing: Claude Pro is about $17/mo billed annually against $20/mo monthly, and ChatGPT Business falls from $25/user/mo to $20/user/mo.

Chatbot pricing

ToolFree tierPaid tiersTeam tierWhat the free tier withholds
ChatGPTYes — latest lightweight modelGo $8/mo, Plus $20/mo, Pro from $100/moBusiness $25/user/mo, $20/user/mo billed annuallyLatest models and higher limits
ClaudeYes — recurring usage capPro $20/mo (about $17/mo billed annually), Max from $100/moNo team tier listedLonger context and higher limits
GeminiYesGoogle AI Plus $4.99/mo, AI Pro $19.99/mo, AI Ultra from $99.99/moNo team tier listedFlagship models and higher limits
DeepSeekYes — full modelAPI is metered per use—Concurrency, not capability
GrokYes, with limited usageSuperGrok $30/mo, SuperGrok Plus $100/mo—Latest model and higher limits

Two things stand out once the table is normalised. First, the flagship band is very narrow: ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro and Gemini AI Pro all land within a dollar of $20/mo, so price is a poor tiebreaker between them and the decision belongs to features and workflow. Second, the free tiers are not the same product. ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek all run a current model on the free plan, so what the free tier withholds is capacity rather than quality — which means "free versus paid" is almost always a question about usage caps. The genuine cost outlier is DeepSeek: free for chat, with an API that meters per use. Our catalog records its V4.1-Flash input at $0.15 per 1M tokens off-peak and $0.30 at peak, with peak defined as UTC weekdays and charged at double the off-peak rate, so the same job costs twice as much at the wrong hour.

Image tool pricing

ToolFree tierEntry paid tierHigher tiers
MidjourneyNoneBasic $10/mo, 200 images/moStandard $30/mo, Pro $60/mo, Mega about $120/mo
Stable DiffusionOpen source, runs locallyFreeDreamStudio and the API are metered per use
FluxOpen weights for some modelsFreeAPI is metered per use
Leonardo AIA daily quotaApprentice $12/moArtisan $30/mo

Image generation is where the free option is strongest and the paid option is least optional. Stable Diffusion remains open source and free to run locally, which is why the honest baseline for this category is $0 plus your own hardware; the trade is that local generation needs a capable GPU and more setup. Midjourney has no free tier at all, so its cheapest entry is Basic at $10/mo for 200 images, and the jump to Pro at $60/mo buys concurrency and stealth rather than a different image. Leonardo AI sits in between with a daily quota on the free plan and Apprentice at $12/mo, which makes it the gentle on-ramp if a quota is enough to test whether you need paid image generation at all.

Coding tool pricing

ToolFree tierPaid tiersTeam tier
CursorYes — limited requestsPro $20/mo, Pro+ $60/mo, Ultra $200/moTeams $40/user/mo
GitHub CopilotYes — 2,000 completions/moPro $10/mo, Pro+ $39/mo, Max $100/moBusiness $19/user/mo
ReplitYes — basic developmentCore $25/mo ($20 billed annually), Pro $100/moContact sales
BoltYes — a basic quotaPro $20/mo—

Coding tools are the category where a free tier is most likely to be enough, because the paid difference is mostly volume rather than capability. GitHub Copilot Free includes 2,000 completions a month, which covers a hobby project comfortably and is the reason its paid plans are billed as credits rather than as access. Cursor has no such floor — the free tier grants a limited number of requests — so it is the tool where a $20/mo decision arrives soonest, and its ladder above that (Pro+ at $60/mo, Ultra at $200/mo) is priced for people running agents all day rather than for people who write code with occasional help. Note the naming mismatch that trips up budget spreadsheets: Cursor's team plan is called Teams at $40/user/mo, and it is not a business tier of the Pro plan.

How to keep the bill down

Four levers, in the order they save money:

  • Start free and measure: every tool above has a free tier, and the only useful question is which limit you hit first
  • Pay by seat only for weekly work: a $20/mo seat for a twice-a-year task is the most common waste on this list
  • Take the annual discount once the tool has proved itself: it is worth 15-20% and only if you are still using it in month eleven
  • Use the metered API for volume, not for convenience: DeepSeek is free for chat, and its API is cheaper than a seat only when you are automating

Four budget stacks that add up

Monthly budgets, with the arithmetic shown:

  • $0/mo: DeepSeek (chat) + Stable Diffusion (images, local) + the GitHub Copilot free tier
  • $20/mo: ChatGPT Plus alone, which covers drafting, analysis and light coding
  • $30/mo: ChatGPT Plus $20/mo + Midjourney Basic $10/mo
  • $70/mo: ChatGPT Plus $20/mo + Claude Pro $20/mo + Cursor Pro $20/mo + Midjourney Basic $10/mo

The stacks are worth reading as arithmetic rather than as recommendations, because each one exposes what the money is actually buying. The $0 stack works because DeepSeek, Stable Diffusion and Copilot Free each withhold capacity rather than capability, so nothing in it is a crippled model. The $30 stack is the one that pays for a second habit: an assistant plus an image tool. And the $70 stack is what a full-time creator actually spends, which is why it is worth checking against the $20 stack before adding anything — for most people the difference between $20 and $70 is a third tool they open twice a month.

Frequently asked questions

Is AI worth paying for?
If a tool saves you two hours a month, a $20/mo seat pays for itself at any hourly rate above $10. The test is whether it saves the time, not whether it feels powerful.
What is the cheapest way to use AI?
$0/mo is genuinely available: DeepSeek for chat, Stable Diffusion run locally for images, and the GitHub Copilot free tier for 2,000 completions a month.
Why is there such a price difference between tools?
Usually it is capacity, not quality. ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini all give you a current model on the free tier and charge for higher limits and longer context, so the price buys volume; the real quality gaps appear in specialised image and video tools.
Does annual billing actually save money?
It saves 15-20% where the vendor offers it — Claude Pro is about $17/mo billed annually against $20/mo monthly, and ChatGPT Business is $20/user/mo against $25/user/mo. It is only a saving if you are still using the tool in month eleven.
Why does the same API job cost different amounts on different days?
Because metered APIs price by time as well as volume. Our catalog records DeepSeek V4.1-Flash at $0.15 per 1M input tokens off-peak and $0.30 at peak, with peak being UTC weekdays at double the off-peak rate.

Related Tools

Related Articles

Get the AI tools newsletter

Weekly picks: new tools, comparisons and buying notes. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.